Blurring the Boundaries between Text and Graphic, Word and Picture, Art and Culture
Showing posts with label Philip José Farmer. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Philip José Farmer. Show all posts
Friday, August 28, 2020
Conan the Uncorrupted: Pure Robert E. Howard, Belatedly
Two books came in the mail today: The Conan Chronicles volumes I and II by Robert E. Howard. Originally published in the UK in the early 2000s, I must have missed their debut. I still can't figure out if there ever were counterpart editions in the United States, but if there were, they have evaded me.
Thursday, May 14, 2020
Another Roadside Attraction and the Popular Cover-Up Genre
I am currently reading Another Roadside Attraction for a
second time, more than forty years after reading as a virginal senior in high school. Recommended
to me by Nikki Robertson, the quintessential daughter of fortune-telling
free spirits who attended the Livonia Career Center, the book had a
profound effect on me, and as I'm reading it again, I remember almost
every bit of it.
Monday, May 6, 2019
Pictopia in Pittsburgh: Pulse-Pounding Panel PIX Didn't Want You to See!
I will be offering a slideshow lecture at this year's 2019 Three Rivers Comic Con on Sunday, May 12, 2019 at 3:00 pm.
Saturday, December 1, 2018
Comics Bait: Why Hate Has Erupted in the Superhero Mainstream
Certainly one of the most unwelcome developments in the world of cartooning in 2018 has been the emergence of a fascistic Far-Right Wing among comic book creators – calling for not only that certain well-known corporate-own trademarks be “restored” to their original straight-white-male secret identity orientation (this will surely make America great again – but don’t call me Shirley) – but also for boycotts and even acts of violence against those they see as corrupting their “hobby” by fighting for social justice (usually hapless editors and publishers with the thankless task of trying to widen comics readership in a dwindling digital age).
Elsewhere I have discussed the many ways the Comics Haters’ “reasoning” makes little sense, and how their political attributions are merely misplaced frustration at having been through the mainstream fuck mill and dumped out, obsolete and useless, on the other side.
What has gone unremarked, as far as I can tell – and perhaps isn’t even all that remarkable – is that these reactionary hate-mongers (one hesitates to use the term “creators”) were all work-for-hire labor (again, one hesitates to use the term “talent”) employed by big mainstream superhero publishers in the 90s and 2000s.
When you think about it, it’s not all that surprising that a Far-Right Comics Hate movement would emerge among work-for-hire superhero has-beens. After all, as freelancers, their minds have necessarily been preoccupied with decades of continuity in the two major superhero universes – not to mention pockets of comics and pop-culture history like Fiction House's Jungle Comics, Lev Gleason-Charles Biro Crime Does Not Pay comics, hardboiled detective fiction, pulps, and the like – leaving little room for nuanced thought.
Much of this material may be viewed as socially regressive (I’ve long maintained it requires a generous sense of humor if not a bit of Philip José Farmer-esque schizophrenia to properly enjoy it), but that’s not my point. Rather, these freelancers have had no choice but to study this material religiously, since making pitches to the Big Publishers for new spins over well-trod ground depends on being knowledgeable about which kinds of soles belong on which boots in which multiverse.
Being immersed in such continuity trivia means these Comics Haters have had little time to read The Nation or The New York Review of Books, let alone listen to NPR or watch the PBS Newshour. By the same token, their lucrative employment allows them to subscribe to cable, and mainstream creators can be forgiven for confusing leggy blondes on Roger Ailes’ Fox News with actual journalists. (Alternative cartoonists, as I can attest, can only afford free, and therefore liberal, broadcast media.)
It also goes without saying that none of the Comics Haters seems to have come from the ranks of alternative comics. The comic book Left – if I can employ such an over-simplified term – traces its lineage back to EC Comics (perhaps the most left-leaning, socially progressive comic book imprint in the history of newsstand comics) and blatantly counter-cultural1960s Undergrounds.
Significantly, neither EC nor the Undergrounds ever generated much in the way of identifiable trademarks to rival the major corporate-owned superhero properties, or for that matter ongoing comic book series or continuing characters. Rather, the Left has always seemed to specialize in one-off short stories (particularly in the case of EC, Harvey Kurtzman's anti-war Frontline Combat and irreverent Mad, and Ray Bradbury adaptations and proto-Rod Serling Twilight Zone black-outs in Shock SuspenStories), and only sporadically-recurring characters such as Robert Crumb’s Mr. Natural or Frank Stack’s New Adventures of Jesus. The most notable exception would be Mad Magazine itself, which has since devolved into more of a brand than a property, and Gilbert Shelton’s Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers, the closest thing the Underground ever came to launching a licensable commodity.
[Crumb himself, so paranoid about selling out and so revolted by Ralph Bakshi’s animated adaptation, famously killed off Fritz the Cat, just as the character was on the brink of becoming a household word.]
That’s not to say that Comics Haters are completely ignorant of EC or the UGs; it just that this rich tradition of Leftist comics and comix material has never been on the mainstream freelancer’s required reading list. That’s because the bread and butter of your average hapless freelancer consists of putting together pitches to revamp forgotten Silver Age superheroes and hoping to convince Big Company editors to hire them for the script and art chores. Who would you pitch a spin-off to Bernie Krigstein’s Master Race to, anyway?
As I’ve said before, the “social justice warriors” that Comics Haters see as having taken over mainstream comics have always existed; indeed, nearly all of the characters that are the subject of contention and condemnation for being rebooted as female, LGBTQ, African-American, or asexual by Comics Hate were created by a generation of Left-leaning, socially conscious, and – mostly – Jewish creators, who, if alive today and aware of the controversy, would steadfastly condemn the Comics Haters as the regressive, white-supremacist, Apartheid-mongering pigs that they are.
If the Far Right Comics Hate is more or less ignorant of or willfully oblivious to the Leftist origins of the American comic book and the history of the frankly Leftist EC-UG-Alternative comix lineage, Leftists often display an equivalent ignorance and/or bias against the superhero genre. Those who work in the Leftist tradition tend to have an innate abhorrence for mainstream superheroes (one thinks of Daniel Clowes’ Dan Pussey stories, the constant use of pejoratives like “muscle-boy comics” by Alternative cartoonists, or the bias comics scholars demonstrate for autobiographical, nominally “realist” memoir comics over other genres). Too often, this has resulted in drawing that appears completely ignorant of human anatomy and art history and writing that seldom if ever rises above Beatnik nihilism.
Whether the superhero genre is latently conservative, regressive, or fascistic – as Leftist cartoonists have always feared – even in its most liberal manifestations (one thinks of Denny O’Neil and Neal Adams “finding America” riff on Stirling Silliphant’s Route 66 in Green Lantern-Green Arrow), it is curious that mainstream comics have tended to favor continuing series and marketable trademarks while the Left has tended to concentrate on self-contained short stories (come to think of it, Route 66 – in which Buz Murdock and and Tod Stiles tooled across the country in a silver Corvette – has been described as an anthology TV series masquerading as an episodic continuity). Perhaps there is something fractured and discontuous in the Leftist worldview that mitigates against serialized (and therefore capitalist) entertainment.
To finish this essay by making it all about myself – and to place myself as morally superior to all sides in the current controversy – let me just point out that I have always occupied a no-man’s land, thanks to Megaton Man. Ostensibly a parody of Silver Age superhero clichés but initially published by a legacy Underground publisher (Kitchen Sink Press), Megaton Man was neither a mainstream success nor a critical darling; both the Left and the Right found something to hate in it. For the Fantagraphics snobs (for whom I would later make a tidy sum of money with King Kong and the Anton Drek Eros Comix), Megaton Man was obviously a “muscle-boy” comic; for the mainstream, or at least a large swath of those employed by the Big Companies in the 1980s and 1990s, it was a frontal assault on the precious trademarks that represented their livelihoods.
No doubt this is why raising a child out of wedlock, a female-and-black incarnation of the title character (Ms. Megaton Man), an obviously-but-never-outed gay character (Preston Percy), and other “Social Justice Warrior” transgressions in my 1980s storylines flew under the radar.
Neither tribe was paying particular attention.
Elsewhere I have discussed the many ways the Comics Haters’ “reasoning” makes little sense, and how their political attributions are merely misplaced frustration at having been through the mainstream fuck mill and dumped out, obsolete and useless, on the other side.
What has gone unremarked, as far as I can tell – and perhaps isn’t even all that remarkable – is that these reactionary hate-mongers (one hesitates to use the term “creators”) were all work-for-hire labor (again, one hesitates to use the term “talent”) employed by big mainstream superhero publishers in the 90s and 2000s.
When you think about it, it’s not all that surprising that a Far-Right Comics Hate movement would emerge among work-for-hire superhero has-beens. After all, as freelancers, their minds have necessarily been preoccupied with decades of continuity in the two major superhero universes – not to mention pockets of comics and pop-culture history like Fiction House's Jungle Comics, Lev Gleason-Charles Biro Crime Does Not Pay comics, hardboiled detective fiction, pulps, and the like – leaving little room for nuanced thought.
Much of this material may be viewed as socially regressive (I’ve long maintained it requires a generous sense of humor if not a bit of Philip José Farmer-esque schizophrenia to properly enjoy it), but that’s not my point. Rather, these freelancers have had no choice but to study this material religiously, since making pitches to the Big Publishers for new spins over well-trod ground depends on being knowledgeable about which kinds of soles belong on which boots in which multiverse.
Being immersed in such continuity trivia means these Comics Haters have had little time to read The Nation or The New York Review of Books, let alone listen to NPR or watch the PBS Newshour. By the same token, their lucrative employment allows them to subscribe to cable, and mainstream creators can be forgiven for confusing leggy blondes on Roger Ailes’ Fox News with actual journalists. (Alternative cartoonists, as I can attest, can only afford free, and therefore liberal, broadcast media.)
It also goes without saying that none of the Comics Haters seems to have come from the ranks of alternative comics. The comic book Left – if I can employ such an over-simplified term – traces its lineage back to EC Comics (perhaps the most left-leaning, socially progressive comic book imprint in the history of newsstand comics) and blatantly counter-cultural1960s Undergrounds.
Significantly, neither EC nor the Undergrounds ever generated much in the way of identifiable trademarks to rival the major corporate-owned superhero properties, or for that matter ongoing comic book series or continuing characters. Rather, the Left has always seemed to specialize in one-off short stories (particularly in the case of EC, Harvey Kurtzman's anti-war Frontline Combat and irreverent Mad, and Ray Bradbury adaptations and proto-Rod Serling Twilight Zone black-outs in Shock SuspenStories), and only sporadically-recurring characters such as Robert Crumb’s Mr. Natural or Frank Stack’s New Adventures of Jesus. The most notable exception would be Mad Magazine itself, which has since devolved into more of a brand than a property, and Gilbert Shelton’s Fabulous Furry Freak Brothers, the closest thing the Underground ever came to launching a licensable commodity.
[Crumb himself, so paranoid about selling out and so revolted by Ralph Bakshi’s animated adaptation, famously killed off Fritz the Cat, just as the character was on the brink of becoming a household word.]
That’s not to say that Comics Haters are completely ignorant of EC or the UGs; it just that this rich tradition of Leftist comics and comix material has never been on the mainstream freelancer’s required reading list. That’s because the bread and butter of your average hapless freelancer consists of putting together pitches to revamp forgotten Silver Age superheroes and hoping to convince Big Company editors to hire them for the script and art chores. Who would you pitch a spin-off to Bernie Krigstein’s Master Race to, anyway?
As I’ve said before, the “social justice warriors” that Comics Haters see as having taken over mainstream comics have always existed; indeed, nearly all of the characters that are the subject of contention and condemnation for being rebooted as female, LGBTQ, African-American, or asexual by Comics Hate were created by a generation of Left-leaning, socially conscious, and – mostly – Jewish creators, who, if alive today and aware of the controversy, would steadfastly condemn the Comics Haters as the regressive, white-supremacist, Apartheid-mongering pigs that they are.
If the Far Right Comics Hate is more or less ignorant of or willfully oblivious to the Leftist origins of the American comic book and the history of the frankly Leftist EC-UG-Alternative comix lineage, Leftists often display an equivalent ignorance and/or bias against the superhero genre. Those who work in the Leftist tradition tend to have an innate abhorrence for mainstream superheroes (one thinks of Daniel Clowes’ Dan Pussey stories, the constant use of pejoratives like “muscle-boy comics” by Alternative cartoonists, or the bias comics scholars demonstrate for autobiographical, nominally “realist” memoir comics over other genres). Too often, this has resulted in drawing that appears completely ignorant of human anatomy and art history and writing that seldom if ever rises above Beatnik nihilism.
Whether the superhero genre is latently conservative, regressive, or fascistic – as Leftist cartoonists have always feared – even in its most liberal manifestations (one thinks of Denny O’Neil and Neal Adams “finding America” riff on Stirling Silliphant’s Route 66 in Green Lantern-Green Arrow), it is curious that mainstream comics have tended to favor continuing series and marketable trademarks while the Left has tended to concentrate on self-contained short stories (come to think of it, Route 66 – in which Buz Murdock and and Tod Stiles tooled across the country in a silver Corvette – has been described as an anthology TV series masquerading as an episodic continuity). Perhaps there is something fractured and discontuous in the Leftist worldview that mitigates against serialized (and therefore capitalist) entertainment.
To finish this essay by making it all about myself – and to place myself as morally superior to all sides in the current controversy – let me just point out that I have always occupied a no-man’s land, thanks to Megaton Man. Ostensibly a parody of Silver Age superhero clichés but initially published by a legacy Underground publisher (Kitchen Sink Press), Megaton Man was neither a mainstream success nor a critical darling; both the Left and the Right found something to hate in it. For the Fantagraphics snobs (for whom I would later make a tidy sum of money with King Kong and the Anton Drek Eros Comix), Megaton Man was obviously a “muscle-boy” comic; for the mainstream, or at least a large swath of those employed by the Big Companies in the 1980s and 1990s, it was a frontal assault on the precious trademarks that represented their livelihoods.
No doubt this is why raising a child out of wedlock, a female-and-black incarnation of the title character (Ms. Megaton Man), an obviously-but-never-outed gay character (Preston Percy), and other “Social Justice Warrior” transgressions in my 1980s storylines flew under the radar.
Neither tribe was paying particular attention.
Friday, July 24, 2015
The Bizarre Heroes Fiasco: How Megaton Man #11 Still Almost Happened!
Our Story Thus Far: For a three-year period, from December 1984 to October 1987,
I had created 17 consecutive bimonthly comic book issues for my first
publisher, Kitchen Sink Press. These included the color Megaton Man #1-10, a Silver Age superhero parody, and the black-and-white Border Worlds #1-7, a dark, brooding science
fiction saga for mature readers. Each issue averaged more than 33 pages per,
for a total of 510 pages of story, art, and lettering (with some coloring), an
accomplishment unmatched by any other creator for the imprint.
During the second three-year period, from 1988 through 1990,
I created only half that amount of material, or about 250 pages, in eight comic
book issues. These included Return of
Megaton Man #1-3, Megaton Man Meets
the Uncategorizable X+Thems #1, Yarn
Man #1, and Pteranoman #1, all of
which (slightly) furthered the Megaton Man
narrative; Bizarre
Heroes #1, a dramatic superhero tale about Megaclones being cooked up in a secret research lab; and Border Worlds: Marooned #1, an
adults-only eighth issue of my unfinished space station epic.
All tolled, my 750 pages for Kitchen Sink Press in six years would remain
an unmatched achievement by any other creator in the publisher’s history, including Will
Eisner, who created about as much new material over a 30-year association with
the publisher, but not exclusively (works such
as The Building, for example, were first published
in England some time before appearing in a Kitchen Sink Press edition in North America).
The dividing line had been what I wanted to call Megaton Man #11, but which, after the publisher’s
initial acceptance, was by decree renumbered #1, becoming the first issue of the Return of Megaton Man three-issue mini-series. The
communication I received from the publisher around Thanksgiving 1987,
just in time for my 26th birthday, was filled with brutal bullying, verbal
abuse, gross distortions, and uncharitable exaggerations: I was called a prima donna, a hack, and a spoiled egomaniac; I was told
that I had killed or abandoned Megaton
Man and Border Worlds simply
because I had tired of them; and that I had betrayed my fans and publisher, all
because I was incensed that the publisher had reneged on his agreement to
maintain the consecutive numbering of Megaton
Man with issue #11, and had the temerity to point out how a new #1 was a cheap gimmick that belied publishing impotence (see Part II).
Instead, I had been remonstrated by the publisher,
No one the fuck will care about the numbering in the long run if the strip itself has substance. That is the real goal. The short-term pragmatic decisions in the realm of packaging and marketing are traditionally (and best) left to the publisher. Your input is welcome, and you damn well know I’ve been responsive to your input. Your demands are another thing altogether; they are intrusive and likely to backfire.
I was further taunted,
And if you don’t think any publisher can handle your genius, you can always become another Dave Sim, create your “own” self-publishing empire and peddle whatever you want however you want and eliminate the evil middleman. Believe me, it ain’t easy. Settle down and learn to trust my judgment more. Second-guessing everything is your prerogative, but you’re scattering your energy in what I see as a self-destructive path. You’re diluting your output and hurting both of us. Get back to the drawing board and produce that pace-setting comic that stands toe to toe with the best. And then, believe me, we’ll both profit. [1]
As I had tried to explain, maintaining the consecutive numbering
of Megaton Man was important to my sense of extending a cohesive, organic narrative, one that,
much as my erstwhile editor had suggested, viewed the characters over the
long-haul as more than mere parody vehicles. Conversely, the repetitious #1
ploy, which by1988 had metastasized into a virtual declaration by the publisher that they were not really interested in publishing
anything but Don Simpson #1s ever again (see Part II), fractured my sense of Megaton Man as a coherent, ongoing
narrative, and severely retarded the organic growth of the characters and
the relationships that I wanted to explore. The need I felt to creatively justify the
gratuitous #1s also slowed down my imaginative process as I tried my
best to make each stand-alone issue more than just a marketing gimmick.
In retrospect, I regard the Megaton Man #11 moment as one in which I might have been induced to
create Megaton Man once again on a
regular frequency. Instead, the strict #1 regiment enforced upon me a piecemeal, Ground Hog Day routine in perpetuity, ironically guaranteeing
a scattering of my creative energies and dilution of what had been an unmatched,
consistent output. On the one hand, I was free to draw any comic book I wanted
each and every time out (dramatic superhero, science fiction, comedy,
underground, etc.), but on the other, any feeling of momentum of an ongoing “strip”
was perpetually being erased with the next #1. Worse, the marketing gimmick
boomeranged; not only could I no longer recall how many Megaton Man issues I had created, but neither could my fans.
The last straw came at a convention in Ohio in late 1989,
where I met an ardent Megaton Man fan
who monitored the industry closely and ordered comics every month from their
local shop. This particular fan had no idea that Yarn Man #1 had already come and gone, and completely missed it.
Had the miniseries and one-shots been consecutively numbered (Megaton Man #14, #15, #16), overlooking
a back-issue would have been impossible. Moreover, sales for the one-shots were falling, and I was subsidizing my
creator-owned work by freelancing “work-for-hire” assignments from third parties (mostly DC Comics and Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles), which involved illustrating
scripts for comics that I did not own, but which rewarded my labor in multiples over what I had ever earned from royalties on my creator-owned work. Kitchen Sink no longer treated a new Don
Simpson #1 as any kind of special event, and for the most part dumped my work
onto the market with little fanfare. [2] By 1990, I can vividly recall, I felt that I
would have rather thrown the original artwork for my next creator-owned comic book
into the river than have it appear with a Kitchen Sink logo on the cover.
Our parting of the ways was formalized in 1991, and I bought
out the “first right of refusal” clause in my contracts in exchange for the
original artwork for Megaton Man #1,
the original comic book that had taken me 13 months to complete while washing
dishes at a restaurant in Detroit. I was now free and clear to market any
sequels to Megaton Man, Border Worlds, or Bizarre Heroes to another publisher, or self-publish.
My first order of business was to devise a piece of work I
could sell at convention appearances. I had always been fascinated by the
letterhead of the Joe Simon and Jack Kirby studio from the 1940s, which showed
a variety of their creations for different publishers including Captain America
for Timely and the “kid gangs” for National, all arrayed in a “class portrait.”
I decided I would design a limited-edition print of all my characters from Megaton Man and Border Worlds, as well as characters I had created as far back as
junior high school, along with the explicitly erotic characters I had created
under the pseudonym Anton Drek for Fantagraphics, Wendy Whitebread, Undercover Slut and Forbidden Frankenstein, into a similar class portrait.
![]() |
| All my scattered, diluted energies in one place for the first time: the 1991 limited edition print. |
The Simon-Kirby letterhead showed the Red Skull chatting
amiably with an elegant gentleman in a Sherlock Holmes deerstalker cap, and other
characters created for diverse competitors in the comics publishing industry
interacting freely, if only for promotional purposes. No doubt, this image had
inspired the famous wrap-around cover to the publication in which I had seen it
reprinted as a ten-year old in the early 70s, Steranko’s History of Comics, Volume I. This piece including superhero
and adventure characters from nearly every publisher, composed in a spellbinding
mosaic.
Neither the Steranko cover, nor its inspiration, the
Simon-Kirby letterhead, offered “real” interaction between these fictional
characters in a narrative sense. While it was apparently permissible, either
for self-promotion or historical interest, to group Spider-Man and Superman, or
Captain America and the Guardian, in the same drawing, these events were not “really”
happening (it would be years before cross-company team-ups made this possible).
Further, I had been equal parts appalled and enthralled by Philip José Farmer’s
“family tree” concept, in which pulp character like Doc Savage, Tarzan, and the
Shadow turned out to be related (what has come to be known as the “Wold-Newton
Universe”).
![]() |
| The Simon-Kirby studio letterhead of the 1940s, featuring their creations for various publishers oddly mis-colored. |
As I created the artwork for my own print, I pondered the
paradox of Jetstream, a Megaclone from Bizarre
Heroes #1, standing shoulder-to-shoulder with the Frankenstein monster, and
Jenny Woodlore from Border Worlds in
the same contiguous space as Domina from Megaton
Man Meets the Uncategorizable X+Thems #1. These various narratives were
rigidly partitioned in my imagination, not only by time (the future setting of Border Worlds versus the contemporary
setting of everything else), but also by humor and “straight” superheroics. But
these partitions were self-imposed, not legal or contractural, as were the
boundaries separating the characters in the Steranko or Simon-Kirby drawings that
inspired my print.
Not only was I free from the constraints of the tyrannical mindset
of my old publisher, for whom publishing Gay
Comics and Steve Canyon made
perfect branding sense (but for whom my eclectic experiments were a dilution
and scattering of energies); I was also free to transgress the artificial
boundaries I had imposed upon myself. Not only could I draw all of my various characters
interacting in a “class portrait” for a poster-print; I could actually tell
stories with these characters if I felt like it.
I was most eager to continue the narrative of the Bizarre Heroes one-shot I created in my
latter days at Kitchen Sink Press. This featured John Bradford, a younger,
hipper version of Kolchak: The Night
Stalker, and The Meddler, a
character whose originated as a Halloween costume I made in ninth grade, and
the aforementioned mystery of a secret lab manufacturing Megaclones. These Megaclones
were super-powered beings based on normal people that were grown in cylinders to
become perfect specimens of humanity. Upon maturity, they would replace their
counterparts in the real world, assuming their civilian identities until called
upon by a fanatic eugenicist (maliciously made to resemble Will Eisner) to take
over society. At the end of the issue, four Megaclones had escaped, posing a
threat to this evil scheme, and The Meddler had caught wind of these
developments.
In my post-Kitchen Sink period, I now planned to continue
this storyline, particularly wanting to introduce a group of characters around
The Meddler I had created in junior high school that I had called The Crime
Busters, and had intended for comics but had never utilized. These included
Clown, Master of Disguise; B-50, the Hybrid Man; Negative Man (now sometimes
Negative Woman); The Slick (a new name for a hitherto unnamed character); and
more. This was clearly juvenilia recalled from my days as an enthusiastic
reader of comics and Doc Savage paperbacks,
but of such stuff enthusiastic comics could be made.
But the print I created suggested further possibilities.
What if The Phantom Jungle Girl, ostensibly a humorous character when she hung
around with Cowboy Gorilla or The Brilliant Brain, was The Meddler’s lover?
What if Clarissa James, the Detroiter who became Ms. Megaton Man, were to flirt
with John Bradford, columnist for The
Detroit Day? What if Megaton Man could meet Forbidden Frankenstein?
I decided that a new, ongoing series would establish all of
my contemporary characters in a single, organic universe, including those from
the Megaton Man comics as well as my
Anton Drek comics (with plans to eventually bring some of the Border Worlds cast time-travelling back
to late-twentieth-century Detroit). Bizarre
Heroes #1, the Kitchen Sink one-shot, would retroactively become the “pilot
episode,” and the its Megaclone storyline as the over-arching framework for the
series. Once I had established all of my creations in one Megaverse, I could
explore various characters and genres to my heart’s content, guaranteeing that
I would never run out of fresh inspiration or ideas. Creatively, I would have a
field day, and rather than diluting or scattering my energies, I would be able
to concentrate all my creativity in a single, ongoing series that would be
numbered #1, #2, #3, and so on indefinitely.
The problem was finding a new publisher, which I was loathe
to do, or finding the funding to publish Don
Simpson’s Bizarre Heroes myself. This problem was soon solved by the Image tent.
At the time, several prominent Marvel creators had defected
from the company (rebellion was in the wind), to form their own imprint, at
first in association with Malibu Comics. The first public event was held at the
1992 Chicago Comicon, to be housed in a large tent erected in the parking lot
outside the convention hotel. Arrangements for this were coordinated by Gary
Colabuono’s Moondog’s Comics, a Chicago chain, and my his staff, who consisted
of Larry Marder, Chris Ecker, and Bevin Brown, who would run security.
To make a long story very short, Larry Marder, creator of Tales of the Beanworld, had been my
friend for a long time, and in fact when I unexpectedly met him at Chicago
distributor’s warehouse party in 1985, I was carrying around Tales of the Beanworld #1 which I had
bought at a store signing I did months before but had forgotten about. Larry
was working closely with Image upstarts Jim Valentino and Rob Liefeld on the
Image Tent, and one day called me up to tell me that they wanted me to draw a
parody book of their shared universe. Larry wisely understood that I would have
likely blown a cold call, but I was prepared when Jim and Rob phoned me, and Splitting Image was born. When the
actual Chicago Comicon with Image Tent occurred, I spent half my time inside
the hotel in Artists’ Alley, and half outside in the parking lot, soaking up
the ambiance of the rebellion. Erik Larsen proposed a team-up between his
character, The Savage Dragon, and Megaton Man.
From a narrative standpoint, the two Image Megaton Man team-ups I would go on to do
did little to advance the Megaton Man
narrative; indeed, they only further affirmed the view instilled in me by erstwhile
publisher Denis Kitchen that Megaton Man
was merely a cash cow, worthy of only hit-and-run one-shots, and useful only for
funding other projects. On the other hand, the Image team-ups exposed the
character to an audience far larger than Megaton Man had ever enjoyed at
Kitchen Sink Press, and the six-figure windfall that fell into my lap as a
result of Splitting Image #1 and #2, The Savage Dragon vs. The Savage Megaton Man
#1, and later Alan Moore, Rick Veitch, and Steve Bissette’s 1963 and Jim Valentino’s normalman/Megaton Man Special, gave me
the nest egg I needed to launch Don
Simpson’s Bizarre Heroes under my own imprint, Fiasco Comics.
In many respects, while creatively exhilarating, the format
I settled upon for Bizarre Heroes
proved too improvisational, freewheeling, and undisciplined to maintain reader
attention. Characters were introduced but did not appear again for several
issues; storylines and subplots proliferated uncontrollably; there were lots of
fan favorites among the cast, but no stars to anchor the series.
![]() |
| John Bradford, a character I had created in junior high school, witnesses a Megaclone riot in Bizarre Heroes #12. |
On the other hand, Megaton Man and his supporting cast, who
had been on hand to launch Don Simpson’s
Bizarre Heroes #1, would not go away quietly. Even though the Man of
Molecules was relatively the new kid on the block, having been created only in
1982, whereas John Bradford first appeared in a short story I wrote in seventh
grade in 1974, I realized that I had formed long attachments to these
characters through experience of sixteen Kitchen Sink comic book issues (ten
issues of Megaton Man, the
three-issue Return of Megaton Man
mini-series, and three Megaton Man
one-shots). Within a few issues of DSBH,
Megaton Man had a new sidekick, X-Ray Boy; Stella Starlight, the mother of
Megaton Man’s son Simon, had evolved from The See-Thru Girl into The Earth
Mother and for all intents and purposes assumed leadership of the Crime
Busters; and Yarn Man, Cowboy Gorilla, and Gower Goose were raising hell in a
VW van, oblivious to the Megaclone threat.
![]() |
| Covers such as this vividly illustrated the Megaton Man narrative beginning to predominate over the Megaclone storyline. Bizarre Heroes #9 (Fiasco Comics, Inc., February 1995). |
By issue #10, it was becoming obvious to me that the Megaton Man narrative was beginning to
supplant the Megaclone storyline. As I began work on the eleventh issue, I
prepared two versions of the cover, one with the Bizarre Heroes logo, the other with the Megaton Man logo. I sent photocopies to Jeff Smith, creator of
Bone, at Cartoon Books in Columbus, Ohio, from my Fiasco Comics, Inc. office
space in Pittsburgh. I remember the phone call; Jeff urged me to go with Megaton Man #11.
![]() |
| The search was really for Megaton Man, and an alternate design had the Megaton Man logo predominating, almost making this issue Megaton Man #11. |
I really wanted to, but I knew I had at least several more
issues in which the Megaclone storyline would predominate. However, within a
year, Bizarre Heroes #15, essentially
a solo issue featuring The Slick, would be the last for the time being to
concentrate on characters from junior high school. Bizarre Heroes #16 would be doubly-titled Megaton Man vs. Forbidden Frankenstein #1, and Bizarre Heroes #17 would be co-titled Megaton Man #0. The latter was more of an illustrated text than a
comic book story, presenting an overview of the imaginative world I was then
calling the Fiascoverse, but now am inclined to call the Megaverse. The final
page showed the hotrod from Border Worlds,
gesturing toward the time-travel interlude I had planned but still hadn’t
gotten to.
After a seventeen issue run (mirroring the seventeen
non-Border Worlds issues at Kitchen Sink Press), my Image nest egg was
exhausted and the comic book industry began to fall apart. In 1996, more than a
dozen comic book distributors collapsed into two, then finally one; hundreds of
independent comic book shops closed up, and I decided to fold my tent. After a
dozen years in the print comic book industry, I had proven my point: I could publish and
promote my own work as badly as had Kitchen Sink Press! [3]
Next: The Megaton Man Weekly Serial and a few more Megaton Man comics at Image...
More at The Bizarre Heroes Blog!
Read “How Megaton Man Has Evolved in Thirty Years and Why I’m Still Creating Him”
Read “How Megaton Man Has Evolved in Thirty Years and Why I’m Still Creating Him”
[1] Denis Kitchen, letter to Don Simpson, November 25, 1987.
[2] Paradoxically, during the same period of 1988-1990, Xenozoic Tales
by Mark Schultz dropped in frequency from three to two to one per year,
yet remained unproblematically sequentially-numbered, and continued so even when it
dropped to one every two years through the mid-1990s. See Xenozoic Tales at ComicBook Database.
[3] Worse still, I had abandoned a third comic book series, just because I felt like it!
[3] Worse still, I had abandoned a third comic book series, just because I felt like it!
Monday, August 25, 2014
Apocalypse Aborted: Philip José Farmer's Literary Plea
Dynamite’s Doc Savage
#8 is now out, completing the series. I have blogged about this twice before;
rather than reiterating those remarks, let me just say that the story’s ending offers
no further introspection into the ideology of its protagonist, who vows “to abide
by the court’s decisions” in the wake of certain scandalous revelations
concerning his methods, and merely sets the stage for new stories set in the twenty-first
century present. Update accomplished. Since most mainstream comics over the
past generation or more seem afflicted with an emphasis on continuity over
storytelling, resulting in mere dry tabulations of events rather than
full-blooded storytelling, it would have been a false hope to expect an adaptation
of this venerable property to buck the trend. Still, as the inspiration of such
diverse and durable pop culture franchises as Superman and James Bond, I was
rooting for Doc. But my basic judgment stands: this was an ambitious project
that would have been better treated as a prose text, and a creditable first
outing for newcomer artist Bilquis Evely, who was confronted with the arduous task of reconciling
the Baumhofer and Bama versions of Doc while evoking nearly a century of eras
from World War II to the present. But the Dynamite Doc reads more like a dry run for a movie bid and a slightly plodding
exercise in revamping. One only hopes that a collection of this series into a
graphic novel package will allow author Chris Roberson to add some textual
background for the reader to flesh out some of the conceptual material he had
in mind.
If this series will be remembered for anything, I suspect it
will largely be for its enshrinement of certain concepts belonging to Philip
José Farmer into the official Savage canon. For, what is not extrapolated from
Lester Dent’s original pulp series is derived almost entirely from Farmer’s Doc Savage: His Apocalyptic Life and Farmer’s
other original Savage adventures. These
texts are mined for such concepts as Doc’s alleged immortality serum, which
accounts for Doc not aging past fifty and Pat Savage aging more slowly, as
Monk, Ham, and the other Fabulous Five grow old and fade away; and for the
ethical qualms, such as they are, over the Crime College and other practices
deployed by Doc. It is unfortunate that Farmer’s distillation of the pulp
ethos, “to tell a rattling good story,” was not equally taken to heart, nor his
speculation that the only suitable mates for cousins Doc and Pat were each
other (Farmer also points out incestuous themes in the later Lensman novels of E.E. Smith, although I
never made it that far with the other Doc). But the latter probably was not possible under the constraints of a licensing agreement.
But unfortunately, Farmer’s influence on most comics and
fiction fans has always been his penchant for arcane continuity (in line with
industry obsessions) more than his ribald sense of humor. Farmer’s followers
have always taken his “fabulous family tree of Doc Savage,” which they have
dubbed the “Wold-Newton Universe,” far more seriously and reverently than
Farmer himself. To be sure, Farmer’s schematization, not only of Doc’s 181
“supersagas,” but a vast wealth of popular literature besides (including most
of the oeuvre of Edgar Rice Burroughs among others) is done with a great deal
of affection if not obsession and, as Win Scott Eckert points out, without the
benefit of spreadsheet or database technology. The interrelation of adventure
characters such as Doc Savage, Tarzan, Sherlock Holmes, and myriad others has
inspired such projects as Alan Moore’s League
of Extraordinary Gentleman (and will no doubt subtend Dynamite’s Doc Savage
team-up with the Shadow and The Avenger). Indeed, Farmer’s penchant for tying
everything together neatly has contributed not only to the comic book industry’s
mania for continuity, but extended to TV and movie franchises as well, becoming
a general cultural obsession.
Farmer, not as talented a writer as Burroughs or even Dent,
was at least clever enough to realize if he made the sexual drives underlying
the pulps more explicit in the manner of writers such as Henry Miller, William
S. Burroughs, and Norman Mailer, among others, he could unleash more of the sublimated
energy of the genre. Farmer succeeded, not only with the intentionally perverse
and satirical Doc Caliban series (most notably in the homoerotic A Feast Unknown), but eventually
striking gold with his best-selling Riverworld
series, which for a brief moment in the late 1970s dominated the fledging paperback
bookstore market (it was said that the backbone of chains like B. Dalton and
Little Professor, forerunners to juggernauts Borders and Barnes and Noble, was paperback
science fiction, primarily Tolkein’s Lord
of the Rings and James Blish’s workmanlike adaptations of the original Star Trek TV series).
![]() |
| The cover of The Return of Megaton Man #2 (Kitchen Sink Press, August 1988), featuring Doc, Pat, Ham and Monk (or their parodic approximations). © Don Simpson 1988, all rights reserved. |
While I confess an early fascination with Farmer’s Savage family tree, which has played a role in my own work (most notably Bizarre Heroes in the 1990s), I have always valued Farmer’s Doc Savage: His Apocalyptic Life primarily for reasons other than those valued by the Wold-Newtonians. Having read some fifteen or twenty of the Bantam reprints by 1975, I was at first perplexed by that white-covered Bantam paperback, purporting to tell the true “life story” of this purportedly fictional adventure character. It was probably an overcast, wintry day in suburban Detroit when I purchased this odd little book, but to paraphrase Farmer, I will always remember it as a golden afternoon. I have read parts of His Apocalyptic Life too many times to recall, particularly its opening chapters.
Farmer begins Doc Savage: His Apocalyptic Life with a mixture of nostalgic sentiment, provocative literary polemic, and a discursus on the apocalyptic aspect of the Savage supersagas, all of which are quite moving. Apart from the emotional recollections of his youthful readings, and the terse litany of plotlines paraphrased from the adventures themselves, Farmer has a serious point to make on behalf of the “ungreat literature” of the pulps. Following a long harangue against academic snobbery, Farmer concludes, “I am convinced that poplit, despite its massive flaws, is worth a serious study.”
However, Farmer declines to develop this argument any
further, sensing perhaps that a literary defense of the pulps is perhaps
unsustainable, least of all by him—he would have had to have read more Joseph
Campbell than Sigmund Freud. Instead, in the very next sentence he intimates his
personal uncovering of several “biographies of so-called fictional characters,”
introducing the fanciful idea that pulp literature is based on factual accounts
of the exploits of living persons. At first, this seems almost a perverse throw-away
joke, but it will soon emerge as a dominant theme for much of the remainder of
the book. This is sad, because Farmer’s critical plea is serious and heartfelt,
and worth far greater development. But Farmer gives up, as if to say that the
only way to take the pulps seriously is to literally pretend that they are
real, to double down on the credulity of childhood.
It is worth quoting passages at length to examine how Farmer
presents, and then aborts, his argument. Farmer begins the book with a moving
recollection of his youth and the magazine rack of pulp imagination awaiting
him at Smitty’s drugstore. “It was truly a vessel for me,” he recalled,
one which I boarded for many a fabulous voyage down the Mississippi of a boy’s mind. […] It was here that I dipped my line into the waters and brought up the fabulous Argosy magazine once a week. […] Those were golden days. At least, they had their golden moments, and these are what I’ve treasured up in my memory.
After a stint in the service and college on the G.I. Bill, Farmer
developes more grown up tastes in literature. “In my young manhood and
beginning of middle age, between 1949 and October 1964, I rarely thought of Doc
Savage. Such childish things were behind me.” Instead he read a litany of
serious authors and critics, until “Bantam Books resurrected the buried
fifteen-year-old” with the reprinting of the Doc Savage series.
I was just beginning to turn back to the “classics” of my childhood and the pop lit of my youth. And as the Bantams came out, starting with The Man of Bronze, I re-experienced the delights of my juvenile days. This nostalgic joy was tempered by a recognition of literary faults which I’d not noticed during the original readings. However, by then I had gotten over my snobbishness. I knew that much of the “great” literature of the world had, along with the great virtues that made them classics, great flaws. Dostoyevsky, Dickens, Melville, and Twain are splendid examples of this. Examples in poetry are Shakespeare, Milton, and Blake.
Farmer continues,
There is a fifteen-year-old in my brain, and he loves Doc. There is also a seven-year-old who still loves Billy Whiskers, a nine-year-old who still loves Oz and the heroes of ancient Troy and Achaea, a ten-year-old who still loves John Carter of Mars, Tarzan, Rudolf Rassendyll, King Arthur, Og, Son of Fire, Umslopogaas and Galazl, the Ancient Mariner, Captain Nemo, Captain Gulliver, Tom Sawyer, Hiawatha, Jim Hawkins, and Sherlock Holmes.
It is then that Farmer proceeds into his most forceful
polemic.
The “ungreat” literature, the poplit (mystery, romance, adventure, gothic) was put down or ignored by most of the literary critics (and, hence, the intellectuals) on the grounds that they had no merit whatsoever. This is just not so, and perception of this has begun to filter into the academic community. […] There are elements in poplit other than just entertainment. […] It was Jung who pointed out that there was more to be learned about the archetypes and symbols of the unconscious from H. Rider Haggard than from any hundred of self-consciously psychological artistes. And Henry Miller seconds this.
Just so, there is much to be learned from the works of the poplit writers, past and present. And the reader, even the Ph.D., can enjoy himself, if he puts himself into the proper frame of approach. First, he has to be able to enjoy the art of telling a rattling good story. Second, on rereading, he has to be able to abstract the elements that make them psychologically valuable. This requires a somewhat schizophrenic mind, but most scholars have this. Third, he has to be able to fuse one and two if he is going to emerge with the pearl of great price from the depths.
Why is it that A. Conan Doyle and Edgar Rice Burroughs, mere romance adventure writers, are so vastly read today, while hundreds of their contemporary colleagues, so lauded by the critics, have dropped into oblivion? Why is it that these two, along with Haggard, will continue to attract larger and larger audiences, while so many so highly praised today will be forgotten? What are the ingredients of their appeal? Why is it that Burroughs, for one, has had a larger readership, and far more influence on literature, than has Henry James, a hyperconscious “psychological” writer? This latter statement will drive the literati far up the wall (where they should stay), but an objective study would confirm it. This judgment, by the way, comes from Robert Bloch, a mystery-horror writer, author of Psycho, and a keen literary critic. He is widely read, knows the classic psychologists well, but brings up his stories from his personal psyche, which has an umbilical attached firmly to the collective unconscious.
Whether my argument is valid or not, I am convinced that poplit, despite its massive flaws, is worth a serious study.
It is at this point that Farmer’s polemic takes an abrupt nosedive.
From this point forward, the conceit that the Savage supersagas are real, and
the “family tree” theme, will progressively take over the book, filling two
entire addenda. In the meantime Farmer will compellingly compare Dent, the “revelator
from Missouri, to Henry Miller, E.E. “Doc” Smith, and William S. Burroughs, and
rattle off a breathtaking synopsis of the supersagas in support of his
contention that they are apocalyptic literature. But he will no longer argue
for the literary merit of poplit in literary-critical terms.
This is disturbing, among other reasons, for what it implies about the creative literary impulse itself. For, in order to take the Wold-Newton concept seriously, we have to posit a world in which mainstream journalism and publishing completely ignore the world-saving exploits of adventure characters, who nonetheless grant permission to pulp and adventure publishers to chronicle their exploits in rushed and sloppy hackwork. Lester Dent, Edgar Rice Burroughs, and other fabulist writers are reduced to mere reporters of actual facts. Indeed, whenever Farmer comes across a moment in the Doc Savage mythos which is either too absurd or irreconcilable with the continuity he is establishing, he consistently chalks it up to writers relying on their feeble imaginations to fill in gaps in the factual account. Of one Savage installment he finds particularly implausible, Farmer asserts,
the ridiculous and badly written Yellow Cloud read[s] as if plotted and typed in one day and sent out by midnight messenger directly to a drunken printer with literary aspirations.
In other words, the best pulp writing is when the writer
sticks to the facts, and the worst is when the writer is just making stuff
up—certainly a paradoxical way to praise the literary merits of creative
material.
![]() |
| Philip José lays out the fabulous family tree of Megaton Man. Spread of pp. 6-7, from The Return of Megaton Man #2 (Kitchen Sink Press, August 1988) © Don Simpson 1988, all rights reserved. |
Perhaps the popularity of the Wold-Newton Universe, and the
mania for continuity in comics and other popular media that has gripped our culture at large, is indicative of some
innate self-loathing expressed by Farmer in His
Apocalyptic Life. In any case, it would be preferable if creative artists
and writers were to keep in mind Farmer’s visionary if not apocalyptic postulations,
and embrace the sheer love of “the art of telling a rattling good story.”
Quotations are excerpted without permission from Doc Savage: His Apocalyptic Life (Bantam,
1975), from Chapter 1 and 2, “The Fourfold Vision,” and “Lester Dent, the
Revelator from Missourri,” pp. 1-25. A “Definitive Edition,” edited by Win
Scott Eckert, complete with a heavily “Wold-Newtonian” introduction, was
published in 2013 by Altus Press; the ebook version was consulted in
preparation for this post. © 1973, 2013 by the Philip J. Farmer Family Trust.
All rights reserved. Images from The
Return of Megaton Man #2 are © Don Simpson 1988, all rights reserved.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












